individual company report on monzo

Pick a Fintech company that interests you and figure out how it is improving the financial services landscape.

Each student must choose a unique company to research. Before starting, you will need to let me know your desired company and I will check to make sure there are no duplicates.

All students will present to the class on April 3rd in groups.

An excellent paper will include the following 5 components:

1. 4-7 pages in length (not including visuals). Brevity is valued.

2. Competitive analysis of 5-10 companies going after the same market or having the same product, with a focus and more detail around the 1 company that you think is their greatest threat, and why. Make sure to always have supporting references. I’m looking for informed opinions.

3. An understanding of the company’s organizational structure and why it is advantageous.

4. Criticisms and insights resulting from your findings about the company.

5. Video or voice-recording evidence of a personal interview with an employee of that company. You should prepare a list of 10 questions in advance and figure out a way to arrange a brief 10 – 15 minute interview with someone from that company. A link to the video or voice recording should be uploaded in the comments section. Anyone who does not upload a video or voice recording of the interview, will automatically lose 3 points. Even if you are not able to record the interview, it is a requirement that you meet with an employee. Failure to do so will result in a loss of 6 points. This is a critical component. Make sure to elaborate on the findings from your interview in the paper. The 10 questions for the employee should be included as an addendum at the end of your paper. If unable to speak to an employee and do an interview, you can instead look up an interview of an employee (in print or video) from that company and provide an overview of what was discussed, and answered. Please cite the reference and include the write up in the body of your paper.

Rubric

Company Report

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

10.0 pts

Excellent

Presentation is clearly organized and easy to follow with smooth transitions from one subject to the next.

8.5 pts

Good

Presentation is organized, but some transitions are rough. Clarity of structure is generally good.

7.8 pts

Satisfactory

There is a general sense of organization. Transitions are rough and presentation sometimes lacks clear structure.

6.5 pts

Inadequate

Presentation is disorganized. Transitions are rough and presentation is not well-structured.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

Presentation is completely disorganized with no sense of organization.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

14.0 pts

Excellent

Exceptionally well presented and argued. Ideas are detailed, well developed, and supported with specific evidence and facts, as well as examples and specific details.

11.9 pts

Good

Well-presented and argued. Ideas are detailed, developed and supported with evidence and details, mostly specific.

10.92 pts

Satisfactory

Content is generally sound. Ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported. The analysis uses some evidence, but it is usually of a generalized nature.

9.1 pts

Inadequate

Content is confusing and/or difficult to follow. Ideas are unclear and undersupported. The analysis is based on little to no evidence.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

Content is not sound.

14.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInsights and Criticisms

10.0 pts

Excellent

Exhibits a clear understanding from the research. Extraordinary insights offered that might not be immediately obvious or evident from a cursory review. Substantiated opinions.

8.5 pts

Good

Solid understanding of the company and its workings. Obvious insights, yet well presented and substantiated.

7.8 pts

Satisfactory

Good understanding of the company but the information presented doesn’t reveal anything new. Adequate analysis of the company’s position in the market.

6.5 pts

Inadequate

Insufficient understanding of the company and its workings. Few critical insights, but lacking substantiation.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

Understanding of the company, insights and criticisms are absent or severely lacking.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEmployee Interview

6.0 pts

Full Marks

10 interview questions prepared and added to the addendum of your paper. Analysis from the interview included in the body of your paper. A video or voice-recording of the interview uploaded to the comments section.

5.0 pts

Half Marks

If unable to speak to an employee and do an interview, you can instead look up an interview of an employee (in print or video) from that company and provide an overview of what was discussed, and answered. Please cite the reference and include the write up in the body of your paper.

0.0 pts

No Marks

Failure to do an interview with an employee. No video or voice-recording. No interview analysis. No list of questions in the addendum. No coverage or a third party interview or video.

6.0 pts

Total Points: 40.0

Boost your Grades with us today!

individual company report on monzo

Rubric

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Our Experts can help. Use the coupon code SAVE30 to get your first order at 30% off!